
Steve/Promhandicam is now a global moderator (a mod in all areas basically) so try not to p*ss him off too much

Jase been grooming him good and propermattty wrote:FFS overlooked again...I'm off to the pub
Well done Steve.
Good call my ar*e. I bet it was 50/50 between us. I reckon it was a split vote and Jas cracked and went for his mate, bloody splitter. This is the last your gonna see of me... don't try and stop me... I mean itmark270981 wrote:Well done Steve
Good call to be honest
I've created this section just for those of you who have made a financial contribution to the upkeep of this forum. Any major changes will be posted in here for your consultation and if you have any requests, we'll actually listen to them if posted here (maybe...)
Cheers,
Dave
It's not a big deal, I just thought this was exactly the sort of thing subscribers would discuss and agree on.jfc wrote:We didnt think it was a big deal and it had been asked for .
Mr Ed wrote:It's not a big deal, I just thought this was exactly the sort of thing subscribers would discuss and agree on.jfc wrote:We didnt think it was a big deal and it had been asked for .
Well since you mention it, there's another change carried out unilaterally without discussion. Again, not a big deal, but not done in what I thought was the spirit of the subscription era. I personally don't mind the forum being controlled by a small group who make decisions rather than a democracy, but you can't say it's one thing, then do another.jfc wrote: By removing the subscriber tools
It has always been controlled by the Admin and Mods . Nothing has changed . Is Jacob at your house ?I personally don't mind the forum being controlled by a small group who make decisions rather than a democracy, but you can't say it's one thing, then do another.
This is very confusing when your posts keep changing after you've posted them, anyway...jfc wrote:If its not a big deal then it isnt a major change is it .
It has always been controlled by the Admin and Mods . Nothing has changed . Is Jacob at your house ?I personally don't mind the forum being controlled by a small group who make decisions rather than a democracy, but you can't say it's one thing, then do another.
Nothing has changed
What would be considered major?jfc wrote:If its not a big deal then it isnt a major change is it
Spending subscribers money at the pub ?Mr Ed wrote:What would be considered major?jfc wrote:If its not a big deal then it isnt a major change is it
Well now i have someone local to discuss the forum with ...........jonnyd wrote:Spending subscribers money at the pub ?Mr Ed wrote:What would be considered major?jfc wrote:If its not a big deal then it isnt a major change is it
Whilst not wishing to upset the celebrations I have to say I am very much with Ed on this one and will give the subject of subscription a bit more thought next time around.Mr Ed wrote:Well done Steve.
I will preface my next comment by saying that I think Steve will be a great moderator and fully support his appointment, however...
In the era of subscribers who contribute to the financial running of the forum, shouldn't something like the appointment of a new moderator be the subject of at least a discussion, if not something as democratic as a vote?
I've created this section just for those of you who have made a financial contribution to the upkeep of this forum. Any major changes will be posted in here for your consultation and if you have any requests, we'll actually listen to them if posted here (maybe...)
Cheers,
Dave
So all the comments about involvement were crap then?jfc wrote:That is up to you . Admin have always paid to run this forum and it was the members that wanted to contribute so we allowed them . Admin where always happy to pay for this place for you to enjoy and still are should you decide not to donate .
It isnt a fee its a donation to a place we all want to enjoy .
Power goes to heads, but heads (or their wallets) don't actually want to pay for all the power.jfc wrote:I think someone needs a cuddle .
Strange but truesainty wrote:Good luck Steve, you might need it with the high levels of wet fannyism displayed round here at the moment.